Target Group Navigation:
- 1:GROUP
- 2:RESEARCH
- 3:PUBLICATIONS
- 4:SUPPORT
- 5:NEWS
MR elastography (MRE) is capable of monitoring bulk shear vibrations in soft biological tissues (1-3). Muscle MR elastography (4-10) is currently developing towards a straightforward technique for detecting several diseases which affect muscle elasticity such as hypogonadism (11) or obstructive pulmonary disease (12). In MRE, the sensitivity of shear wavelengths to elasticity changes is usually exploited for mapping elastic heterogeneities by elastograms. For muscle tissue additionally the anisotropy of the elasticity has to be taken into account. This specific property causes a direction dependency of shear wavelengths giving rise to misinterpreting isotropic elastograms (13). On the other hand anisotropic wave propagation bears valuable information about the mechanical structure of the material. Therefore, different approaches have been made to measure the shear wave speed in skeletal muscles as a function of directionality (5,9,14-17).
Elastic waves in anisotropic solids are governed by three distinct wave modes corresponding to the eigenvalues of the wave speed tensor (18). Two of them, the slow and the fast transverse wave mode determine the appearance of wave patterns in shear-wave based elastography. In literature a simple relationship between anisotropic wave propagation and elasticity is given by the slow-transverse wave mode (cST). There, the waves are emanating from a point-source in ellipsoidal patterns with wave numbers (k) corresponding to the anisotropy of the shear elasticity:
mu_xy and mu_xz denote the shear moduli for a transverse isotropic material with principal axis Z running along the main axis of the muscle. The second transverse wave mode (denoted by subscript FT for fast transverse) displays a more complex relation between wave speed and the shear stiffness of an incompressible material:
(2)
Here, in addition to the shear moduli m_xy and m_xz, the ratio of the Young’s moduli E_z / E_x determines the form and the polarization of the shear waves. Please note, both eqs.1 and 2 apply for transverse isotropy but only eq.2 is bound to the condition of incompressibility.
To analyze experiments, it is necessary to know whether the observed waves in MRE are due to the ST-mode, the FT-mode or a superposition of both wave modes. Fortunately, MRE allows the encoding and, in some cases, also the excitation of single components of the wave field with an arbitrary image slice position. In general, the experimental setup is chosen in such a way as to avoid a superposition of ST- and FT-wave modes. The image plane must thus be aligned with the principal axes of the wave field which in turn should be polarized along one principal stress. For capturing the preferred ST-waves the excitation direction and the motion sensitization direction have to be through-plane. Then, the shear wave length lz (along the muscle fibers) directly indicates mu_xz while mu_xy is deducible from waves running along a perpendicular profile. This approach is valid as long as the wave propagation is non-dispersive and boundary effects are negligible. The profile-based analysis of shear stiffness in human muscle was demonstrated in (4,5,16,17).
Other authors have shown that boundary effects cause wave speed components and waveforms which are not in explained by a model of infinite anisotropic medium (9,15). Therefore, current developments in muscle MRE should address such limits caused by an extended wave source and the boundary constraints of the examined object.
1. Muthupillai R, Lomas DJ, Rossman PJ, Greenleaf JF, Manduca A, Ehman RL. Magnetic resonance elastography by direct visualization of propagating acoustic strain waves. Science 1995;269(5232):1854-1857.
2. Plewes DB, Betty I, Urchuk SN, Soutar I. Visualizing tissue compliance with MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 1995;5(6):733-738.
3. Lewa CJ, De Certaines JD. Viscoelastic property detection by elastic displacement NMR measurements. J Magn Reson Imaging 1996;6(4):652-656.
4. Dresner MA, Rose GH, Rossman PJ, Muthupillai R, Manduca A, Ehman RL. Magnetic resonance elastography of skeletal muscle. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001;13(2):269-276.
5. Sack I, Bernarding J, Braun J. Analysis of wave patterns in MR elastography of skeletal muscle using coupled harmonic oscillator simulations. Magn Reson Imaging 2002;20(1):95-104.
6. Jenkyn TR, Ehman RL, An KN. Noninvasive muscle tension measurement using the novel technique of magnetic resonance elastography (MRE). J Biomech 2003;36(12):1917-1921.
7. Heers G, Jenkyn T, Dresner MA, Klein MO, Basford JR, Kaufman KR, Ehman RL, An KN. Measurement of muscle activity with magnetic resonance elastography. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2003;18(6):537-542.
8. Uffmann K, Maderwald S, Ajaj W, Galban CG, Mateiescu S, Quick HH, Ladd ME. In vivo elasticity measurements of extremity skeletal muscle with MR elastography. NMR Biomed 2004;17(4):181-190.
9. Papazoglou S, Braun J, Hamhaber U, Sack I. Two-dimensional waveform analysis in MR elastography of skeletal muscles. Phys Med Biol 2005;50(6):1313-1325.
10. Bensamoun SF, Ringleb SI, Littrell L, Chen Q, Brennan M, Ehman RL, An KN. Determination of thigh muscle stiffness using magnetic resonance elastography. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006;23(2):242-247.
11. Galban CJ, Maderwald S, Herrmann BL, Brauck K, Grote W, de Greiff A, Uffmann K, Ladd ME. Measuring Skeletal Muscle Elasticity in Patients with Hypogonadism by MR Elastography. In: Proceeding of the 13th Annual Meeting of ISMRM. Miami. 2005. p 2016.
12. Galban CJ, Maderwald S, Eggebrecht H, Grote W, de Greiff A, Uffmann K, Ladd ME. Monitoring the Effects of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease on Muscle Elasticity by MR Elastography. In: Proceeding of the 13th Annual Meeting of ISMRM. Miami. 2005. p 2015.
13. Sack I, Samani A, Plewes DB, Braun J. Simulation of in vivo MR Elastography wave patterns of skeletal muscles using a transverse isotropic elasticity model. In: Proceeding of the 11th Annual Meeting of ISMRM. Toronto. 2003. p 587.
14. Gennisson JL, Catheline S, Chaffai S, Fink M. Transient elastography in anisotropic medium: application to the measurement of slow and fast shear wave speeds in muscles. J Acoust Soc Am 2003;114(1):536-541.
15. Romano AJ, Abraham PB, Ringleb SI, Rossman PJ, Bucaro JA, Ehman RL. Analysis of anisotropic propagation utilizing wave-guide constrained magnetic resonance elastography. In: Proc 13th Annual Meeting ISMRM. Miami. 2005. p 2556.
16. Oida T, Kang Y, Azuma T, Okamoto J, Amano A, Axel L, Takizawa O, Tsutsumi S, Matsuda T. The measurement of anisotropic elasticity in skeletal muscle using MR Elastography. In: Proceeding of the 13th Annual Meeting of ISMRM. Miami. 2005. p 2020.
17. Papazoglou S, Rump J, Braun J, Sack I. Shear-wave group-velocity inversion in MR elastography of human skeletal muscle. Magn Reson Med 2006; 56, 489-497, 2006
18. Musgrave MJP. Crystal Acoustics. San Fransisco: Holden-Day; 1970.

Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
CCM: Campus Charité Mitte
CC 6: Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine
Postal address:
Charitéplatz 1
10117 Berlin
Internal address:
Sauerbruchweg 4
t: +49 30 4 50 53 90 58
f: +49 30 4 50 53 99 01